Separate speaking orders on reopening objections are mandatory; deciding them within reassessment invalidates jurisdiction and precludes revival of st...
Page of 4912
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
521 to 540 of 98239 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition u/s 68 - bogus share application/allotment money - The Court noted the factual examination done by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) regarding the share capital of the companies involved. It found that the share capital raised by one of the companies in the assessment year 2009-10 had already been added back in the hands of the party, indicating its genuineness. The Court upheld the action of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and ITAT in deleting the additions.
Addition u/s 68 - bogus share application/allotment money - The Court noted the factual examination done by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) regarding the share capital of the companies involved. It found that the share capital raised by one of the companies in the assessment year 2009-10 had already been added back in the hands of the party, indicating its genuineness. The Court upheld the action of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and ITAT in deleting the additions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.