Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Claim of Interest on Refund u/s 7 of the DTVSV Act, 2020 - The High court determined that the petitioner was entitled to refunds as quantified in the Rectification Order dated 29.01.2021. However, it was held that interest under Section 244-A of the IT Act, 1961, was not permissible in light of the DTVSV Act, 2020's provisions, particularly the explanation to Section 7 which precludes interest on excess amounts refunded under the Act. - The court noted the petitioner's adjustments of refunds from later Assessment Years towards the payable amounts for earlier years were acknowledged. However, the court declined the recognition of interest on these adjustments as per the DTVSV Act, 2020.
Claim of Interest on Refund u/s 7 of the DTVSV Act, 2020 - The High court determined that the petitioner was entitled to refunds as quantified in the Rectification Order dated 29.01.2021. However, it was held that interest under Section 244-A of the IT Act, 1961, was not permissible in light of the DTVSV Act, 2020's provisions, particularly the explanation to Section 7 which precludes interest on excess amounts refunded under the Act. - The court noted the petitioner's adjustments of refunds from later Assessment Years towards the payable amounts for earlier years were acknowledged. However, the court declined the recognition of interest on these adjustments as per the DTVSV Act, 2020.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
