Juridical seat versus arbitral venue determines supervisory court jurisdiction, while timely award challenges remain within the prescribed limitation ...
Revision u/s 263 - as per CIT AO has not examined increase in share capital - The Tribunal noted that the AO had indeed accepted the correct balance sheet filed during the assessment proceedings, and the discrepancies between the original and rectified balance sheets were duly explained by the assessee. Therefore, the assessment order was held to be neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interests of revenue due to the thorough verification conducted by the AO.
Revision u/s 263 - as per CIT AO has not examined increase in share capital - The Tribunal noted that the AO had indeed accepted the correct balance sheet filed during the assessment proceedings, and the discrepancies between the original and rectified balance sheets were duly explained by the assessee. Therefore, the assessment order was held to be neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interests of revenue due to the thorough verification conducted by the AO.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
