Transfer-pricing reimbursement adjustments require uncontrolled comparables and cannot become expense-genuineness reviews, resulting in deletion of th...
Food import sampling requirements support provisional release where unseized consignments conform to standards and raw areca classification is unestab...
Diagnostic microcuvette classification follows sole-use analytical function, placing specialised disposable cuvettes with their analyser rather than g...
Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The tribunal sided with the assessee on the key issue of the legality of the re-assessment notice under section 148. It was held that the notice was invalid as it was issued without the required sanction from the competent authority as prescribed under section 151(1) of the Act after the expiry of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year. - The ITAT observed that the argument that the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020 (TOLA) extended the time limit for issuing the notice was not applicable in this case.
Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The tribunal sided with the assessee on the key issue of the legality of the re-assessment notice under section 148. It was held that the notice was invalid as it was issued without the required sanction from the competent authority as prescribed under section 151(1) of the Act after the expiry of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year. - The ITAT observed that the argument that the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020 (TOLA) extended the time limit for issuing the notice was not applicable in this case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.