Departmental appeal limitation after call-book recall preserves original filing, while documented correlation supports SAD refund on imported granules...
Income-tax prosecution fails when appellate remand removes its factual foundation; directors require company arraignment for vicarious criminal liabil...
Capital character of assignment consideration prevents taxation as residuary income, while unsupported interest-related expenditure remains non-deduct...
Make-available condition shields regional support-service receipts from Indian taxation where no independent capability or permanent establishment exi...
Transfer-pricing treatment of corporate guarantees and convertible loans followed prior-year consistency, with taxable foreign dividends excluded from...
Transfer-pricing benchmarking confines adjustments to associated-enterprise transactions and integrates delayed receivables through TNMM working-capit...
Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - amount received as part of salary/remuneration paid to the assessee - The ITAT examined the statements recorded during the survey and the impounded trial balance. It noted that while the appellant claimed the amount was received as advance against remuneration, the trial balance showed the amount under the head of short term loan & advance. However, the Tribunal observed that the books of accounts were incomplete at the time of the survey, and entries made by the junior accountant were not approved by management. - The tribunal accepted the argument that the company had deducted TDS on remuneration paid. - The ITAT held that since the appellant had already accounted for the disputed amount in their income tax return and paid tax on it, there would be double taxation if the amount was treated as deemed dividend.
Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - amount received as part of salary/remuneration paid to the assessee - The ITAT examined the statements recorded during the survey and the impounded trial balance. It noted that while the appellant claimed the amount was received as advance against remuneration, the trial balance showed the amount under the head of short term loan & advance. However, the Tribunal observed that the books of accounts were incomplete at the time of the survey, and entries made by the junior accountant were not approved by management. - The tribunal accepted the argument that the company had deducted TDS on remuneration paid. - The ITAT held that since the appellant had already accounted for the disputed amount in their income tax return and paid tax on it, there would be double taxation if the amount was treated as deemed dividend.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4894 
