Independent manufacturing undertaking eligibility preserves Section 80IA/80IB deductions, while machinery kept ready for use qualifies for depreciatio...
Assessing Officer Satisfaction Requirement Bars Penalty for Cash Receipt in Immovable-Property Sale Cases Where Initiation Lacks Recorded Satisfaction...
Self-assessed import entries remain appealable, while bona fide classification disputes without misdeclaration cannot justify confiscation or penaltie...
Actual-user customs exemption conditions permit turnkey project transfers when imported windmill components are exclusively used for installation and ...
Customs offence disqualification excludes civil contraventions, preventing refusal of a private bonded warehouse licence based solely on monetary pena...
Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - amount received as part of salary/remuneration paid to the assessee - The ITAT examined the statements recorded during the survey and the impounded trial balance. It noted that while the appellant claimed the amount was received as advance against remuneration, the trial balance showed the amount under the head of short term loan & advance. However, the Tribunal observed that the books of accounts were incomplete at the time of the survey, and entries made by the junior accountant were not approved by management. - The tribunal accepted the argument that the company had deducted TDS on remuneration paid. - The ITAT held that since the appellant had already accounted for the disputed amount in their income tax return and paid tax on it, there would be double taxation if the amount was treated as deemed dividend.
Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - amount received as part of salary/remuneration paid to the assessee - The ITAT examined the statements recorded during the survey and the impounded trial balance. It noted that while the appellant claimed the amount was received as advance against remuneration, the trial balance showed the amount under the head of short term loan & advance. However, the Tribunal observed that the books of accounts were incomplete at the time of the survey, and entries made by the junior accountant were not approved by management. - The tribunal accepted the argument that the company had deducted TDS on remuneration paid. - The ITAT held that since the appellant had already accounted for the disputed amount in their income tax return and paid tax on it, there would be double taxation if the amount was treated as deemed dividend.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
