Unverified Insight Portal Information Cannot Justify Reassessment Without a Verified Taxpayer-Specific Income-Escape Nexus or Demonstrated Application...
Assessing Officer jurisdiction after statutory transfer invalidates reassessment notices issued by transferor officers and nullifies resulting proceed...
Consequential appeal-effect orders must implement rectification deleting working-capital adjustments and reconsider the resulting arm's-length range c...
Discounted cash flow valuation protects share premium where projections are reasonable, while audited book expenses defeat unexplained-expenditure add...
Section 54 construction relief survives pre-transfer commencement when completion occurs within the statutory period, excluding ineligible spouse-owne...
Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - amount received as part of salary/remuneration paid to the assessee - The ITAT examined the statements recorded during the survey and the impounded trial balance. It noted that while the appellant claimed the amount was received as advance against remuneration, the trial balance showed the amount under the head of short term loan & advance. However, the Tribunal observed that the books of accounts were incomplete at the time of the survey, and entries made by the junior accountant were not approved by management. - The tribunal accepted the argument that the company had deducted TDS on remuneration paid. - The ITAT held that since the appellant had already accounted for the disputed amount in their income tax return and paid tax on it, there would be double taxation if the amount was treated as deemed dividend.
Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - amount received as part of salary/remuneration paid to the assessee - The ITAT examined the statements recorded during the survey and the impounded trial balance. It noted that while the appellant claimed the amount was received as advance against remuneration, the trial balance showed the amount under the head of short term loan & advance. However, the Tribunal observed that the books of accounts were incomplete at the time of the survey, and entries made by the junior accountant were not approved by management. - The tribunal accepted the argument that the company had deducted TDS on remuneration paid. - The ITAT held that since the appellant had already accounted for the disputed amount in their income tax return and paid tax on it, there would be double taxation if the amount was treated as deemed dividend.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
