Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Capital gain computation - Allowability of transfer expenses [brokerage, air tickets, hotel accommodation receipts, postal charges receipts, conveyance charges, lawyer fees, photocopying expenses] u/s Section 48(i) - Considering the specific circumstances of the case, where the assessee was a non-resident individual, the Tribunal found that the expenses incurred for obtaining special power of attorney from the Indian Consulate in the USA, air tickets, hotel accommodation, postal charges, conveyance charges, lawyer fees, and photocopying expenses were essential for effecting the transfer of the property. - The ITAT concluded that the claimed expenses were indeed allowable u/s 48(i)
Capital gain computation - Allowability of transfer expenses [brokerage, air tickets, hotel accommodation receipts, postal charges receipts, conveyance charges, lawyer fees, photocopying expenses] u/s Section 48(i) - Considering the specific circumstances of the case, where the assessee was a non-resident individual, the Tribunal found that the expenses incurred for obtaining special power of attorney from the Indian Consulate in the USA, air tickets, hotel accommodation, postal charges, conveyance charges, lawyer fees, and photocopying expenses were essential for effecting the transfer of the property. - The ITAT concluded that the claimed expenses were indeed allowable u/s 48(i)
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.