Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Exempt-income expenditure disallowance is confined to investments that actually generated exempt income, while supported business expenses remain dedu...
Capital gain computation - Allowability of transfer expenses [brokerage, air tickets, hotel accommodation receipts, postal charges receipts, conveyance charges, lawyer fees, photocopying expenses] u/s Section 48(i) - Considering the specific circumstances of the case, where the assessee was a non-resident individual, the Tribunal found that the expenses incurred for obtaining special power of attorney from the Indian Consulate in the USA, air tickets, hotel accommodation, postal charges, conveyance charges, lawyer fees, and photocopying expenses were essential for effecting the transfer of the property. - The ITAT concluded that the claimed expenses were indeed allowable u/s 48(i)
Capital gain computation - Allowability of transfer expenses [brokerage, air tickets, hotel accommodation receipts, postal charges receipts, conveyance charges, lawyer fees, photocopying expenses] u/s Section 48(i) - Considering the specific circumstances of the case, where the assessee was a non-resident individual, the Tribunal found that the expenses incurred for obtaining special power of attorney from the Indian Consulate in the USA, air tickets, hotel accommodation, postal charges, conveyance charges, lawyer fees, and photocopying expenses were essential for effecting the transfer of the property. - The ITAT concluded that the claimed expenses were indeed allowable u/s 48(i)
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.