Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Defective SCN - The High court observed that the show cause notice lacked clarity regarding the grounds of alleged violation and did not contain essential details such as the name, designation, or signature of the issuing authority. - It noted that although the notice mentioned attached supporting documents, none were actually attached. - The court further highlighted that the Form GST REG 31 produced by the respondents did not serve as a proper show cause notice for cancellation of registration. - The court set aside both the show cause notice and Form GST REG 31, emphasizing that the respondents could issue a proper notice in accordance with the law if necessary.
Defective SCN - The High court observed that the show cause notice lacked clarity regarding the grounds of alleged violation and did not contain essential details such as the name, designation, or signature of the issuing authority. - It noted that although the notice mentioned attached supporting documents, none were actually attached. - The court further highlighted that the Form GST REG 31 produced by the respondents did not serve as a proper show cause notice for cancellation of registration. - The court set aside both the show cause notice and Form GST REG 31, emphasizing that the respondents could issue a proper notice in accordance with the law if necessary.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.