Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4800
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96000 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Anti-dumping duty - Re-assessment of imported goods - Classification of Import of 30 MT of PVC Resin SG 5 (Suspension Grade) - Verification of Manufacturer - The Tribunal examined the evidence provided by both parties, including invoices, packing lists, and certificates of origin. They concluded that the evidence overwhelmingly supported the Appellant's claim regarding the manufacturer of the goods. - Despite discrepancies in the markings on the bags, the court found that the documents provided by the Appellant were sufficient to establish the manufacturer's identity. - The CESTAT upheld the Appellant's classification of the goods and rejected the Customs Department's argument for a higher anti-dumping duty.
Anti-dumping duty - Re-assessment of imported goods - Classification of Import of 30 MT of PVC Resin SG 5 (Suspension Grade) - Verification of Manufacturer - The Tribunal examined the evidence provided by both parties, including invoices, packing lists, and certificates of origin. They concluded that the evidence overwhelmingly supported the Appellant's claim regarding the manufacturer of the goods. - Despite discrepancies in the markings on the bags, the court found that the documents provided by the Appellant were sufficient to establish the manufacturer's identity. - The CESTAT upheld the Appellant's classification of the goods and rejected the Customs Department's argument for a higher anti-dumping duty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
