Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Anti-dumping duty - Re-assessment of imported goods - Classification of Import of 30 MT of PVC Resin SG 5 (Suspension Grade) - Verification of Manufacturer - The Tribunal examined the evidence provided by both parties, including invoices, packing lists, and certificates of origin. They concluded that the evidence overwhelmingly supported the Appellant's claim regarding the manufacturer of the goods. - Despite discrepancies in the markings on the bags, the court found that the documents provided by the Appellant were sufficient to establish the manufacturer's identity. - The CESTAT upheld the Appellant's classification of the goods and rejected the Customs Department's argument for a higher anti-dumping duty.
Anti-dumping duty - Re-assessment of imported goods - Classification of Import of 30 MT of PVC Resin SG 5 (Suspension Grade) - Verification of Manufacturer - The Tribunal examined the evidence provided by both parties, including invoices, packing lists, and certificates of origin. They concluded that the evidence overwhelmingly supported the Appellant's claim regarding the manufacturer of the goods. - Despite discrepancies in the markings on the bags, the court found that the documents provided by the Appellant were sufficient to establish the manufacturer's identity. - The CESTAT upheld the Appellant's classification of the goods and rejected the Customs Department's argument for a higher anti-dumping duty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
