Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Adjustment made u/s 115JB in Rectification order u/s 154 - Debatable issue - addition of surrendered income by the assessee was included in the book profit of the assessee as per Section 115JB - The Revenue argued that the disclosed income should be considered as part of the book profit for tax calculation purposes. However, the respondent contended that the inclusion of this income required extensive debate and was not supported by incriminating material found during the survey. The Tribunal agreed with the respondent, concluding that the Assessing Officer's action under Section 154 was unwarranted due to the debatable nature of the issue. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the Revenue.
Adjustment made u/s 115JB in Rectification order u/s 154 - Debatable issue - addition of surrendered income by the assessee was included in the book profit of the assessee as per Section 115JB - The Revenue argued that the disclosed income should be considered as part of the book profit for tax calculation purposes. However, the respondent contended that the inclusion of this income required extensive debate and was not supported by incriminating material found during the survey. The Tribunal agreed with the respondent, concluding that the Assessing Officer's action under Section 154 was unwarranted due to the debatable nature of the issue. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the Revenue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
