Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Assessment u/s 153A - addition u/s 68 - The assessee contended that the additions were not based on any incriminating material found during the search. The Tribunal held that no addition could be made under Section 153A in the absence of incriminating material for the years where no assessment was pending. The court accepted this contention and deleted the additions. - The ITAT examined several additions and disallowances made by the assessing officer, including those related to cash deposits, unsecured loans, and depreciation on vehicles. In each instance, the court meticulously evaluated the submissions, documentary evidence, and legal positions before rendering its decisions, often in favor of the assessee by deleting unjustified additions.
Assessment u/s 153A - addition u/s 68 - The assessee contended that the additions were not based on any incriminating material found during the search. The Tribunal held that no addition could be made under Section 153A in the absence of incriminating material for the years where no assessment was pending. The court accepted this contention and deleted the additions. - The ITAT examined several additions and disallowances made by the assessing officer, including those related to cash deposits, unsecured loans, and depreciation on vehicles. In each instance, the court meticulously evaluated the submissions, documentary evidence, and legal positions before rendering its decisions, often in favor of the assessee by deleting unjustified additions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.