PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Cancellation of GST registration of the petitioner - Rule 22 (3) of CER - The court examines the validity of the show cause notice issued by the respondent and considers the petitioner's argument regarding the ex-parte physical verification. It emphasizes the need for adherence to Rule 25 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017, regarding the conduct of such verifications. - The court interprets Rule 22(3) of the Rules, which stipulates a timeframe for issuing an order in response to a show cause notice. It concludes that the provision is directory rather than mandatory, as there are no specified consequences for non-compliance within the stipulated timeframe.
Cancellation of GST registration of the petitioner - Rule 22 (3) of CER - The court examines the validity of the show cause notice issued by the respondent and considers the petitioner's argument regarding the ex-parte physical verification. It emphasizes the need for adherence to Rule 25 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017, regarding the conduct of such verifications. - The court interprets Rule 22(3) of the Rules, which stipulates a timeframe for issuing an order in response to a show cause notice. It concludes that the provision is directory rather than mandatory, as there are no specified consequences for non-compliance within the stipulated timeframe.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
