Pre-amendment reassessment limitation bars late notices under the preserved regime, invalidating consequential reassessment for affected earlier asses...
Cash-sales explanations for bank deposits require documentary reconciliation; reassessment notice survived where effective response time was available...
Functional comparability in transfer pricing prevents ad hoc arm's length adjustments where functions, assets, risks and reliable comparables are unes...
Contingency expenses, exempt-income disallowance, and royalty benchmarking: unsupported adjustments were deleted under consistent accounting and trans...
Valuation - The case involves disputes regarding the inclusion of certain expenses in the taxable value of services provided by the appellant, the denial of abatement/exemption claimed by the appellant, and the imposition of interest and penalties. The CESTAT found that the appellant did not adequately support their claims and failed to address key issues during the adjudication process. As a result, the court remanded the case back to the Original Authority for further consideration.
Valuation - The case involves disputes regarding the inclusion of certain expenses in the taxable value of services provided by the appellant, the denial of abatement/exemption claimed by the appellant, and the imposition of interest and penalties. The CESTAT found that the appellant did not adequately support their claims and failed to address key issues during the adjudication process. As a result, the court remanded the case back to the Original Authority for further consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
