Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
Revision u/s 263 - error noted by the CIT that sale of properties by the assessee during the year was not examined by the AO vis-à-vis its stamp duty value for the purpose of invoking section 43CA - The appellant challenges the validity of the PCIT's directions, particularly regarding property transactions and stamp duty valuations under section 43CA. The ITAT ultimately rules in favor of the appellant, finding no error in the AO's assessment order and determining that the PCIT's directions were beyond the scope of revenue authorities' powers. Additionally, it clarifies the limited role of revenue authorities in questioning stamp duty valuations under section 43CA.
Revision u/s 263 - error noted by the CIT that sale of properties by the assessee during the year was not examined by the AO vis-à-vis its stamp duty value for the purpose of invoking section 43CA - The appellant challenges the validity of the PCIT's directions, particularly regarding property transactions and stamp duty valuations under section 43CA. The ITAT ultimately rules in favor of the appellant, finding no error in the AO's assessment order and determining that the PCIT's directions were beyond the scope of revenue authorities' powers. Additionally, it clarifies the limited role of revenue authorities in questioning stamp duty valuations under section 43CA.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4888 
