Warehousing permission requires deposit at the designated bonded warehouse; unauthorised diversion triggers confiscation, redemption fine and importer...
The appeal pertains to the Assessment Year 2017-18, with the appellant contesting the rejection of agricultural income and the addition of cash deposits during demonetization. The appellant provides comprehensive documentation supporting both claims, while the department fails to furnish conclusive evidence against them. The ITAT finds in favor of the appellant, deleting the additions made by the Assessing Officer.
The appeal pertains to the Assessment Year 2017-18, with the appellant contesting the rejection of agricultural income and the addition of cash deposits during demonetization. The appellant provides comprehensive documentation supporting both claims, while the department fails to furnish conclusive evidence against them. The ITAT finds in favor of the appellant, deleting the additions made by the Assessing Officer.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.