Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Page of 4800
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
421 to 440 of 95999 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Liability to pay interest on the goods cleared to their sister unit in terms of proviso to Rule 9 read with Rule 8 of the Valuation Rules, 2000 - The appellant calculated the cost of production based on annual cost audit reports and compared it with CAS-4 certificates to pay differential duty. They also raised supplementary invoices for duty differences.The department demanded interest on the differential duty paid by the appellant, threatening coercive measures. - The appellant's method of duty payment, based on cost audit reports and CAS-4 certificates, was deemed compliant with the law. The Tribunal ruled that interest is not payable in revenue-neutral situations and set aside the department's demand for interest.
Liability to pay interest on the goods cleared to their sister unit in terms of proviso to Rule 9 read with Rule 8 of the Valuation Rules, 2000 - The appellant calculated the cost of production based on annual cost audit reports and compared it with CAS-4 certificates to pay differential duty. They also raised supplementary invoices for duty differences.The department demanded interest on the differential duty paid by the appellant, threatening coercive measures. - The appellant's method of duty payment, based on cost audit reports and CAS-4 certificates, was deemed compliant with the law. The Tribunal ruled that interest is not payable in revenue-neutral situations and set aside the department's demand for interest.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.