Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
Embezzlement losses in charitable institutions remain allowable when misappropriation is established, irrecoverable, and not a specified-person benefi...
National long-distance undertaking status supports deduction where separately licensed infrastructure, resources, revenue, and expenditure establish c...
Agency reimbursement income follows contractual deposit-liability computation, while pending deposit collections do not constitute deemed-dividend loa...
Page of 4883
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 97649 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Violation under FERA - export proceeds were not realized - The case involved allegations of violations of the FERA Act, 1973 related to the failure to realize export proceeds. A1, A2, and A3 were implicated in export transactions, with evidence suggesting their involvement in facilitating exports and receiving funds. The court dismissed the revision cases, affirming the lower courts' findings of the petitioners' culpability under FERA provisions.
Violation under FERA - export proceeds were not realized - The case involved allegations of violations of the FERA Act, 1973 related to the failure to realize export proceeds. A1, A2, and A3 were implicated in export transactions, with evidence suggesting their involvement in facilitating exports and receiving funds. The court dismissed the revision cases, affirming the lower courts' findings of the petitioners' culpability under FERA provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.