Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Activity amounting to manufacture or not - work of printed labels and printed cartons for corrugated boxes falling under Tariff Heading 48211020 and 48191010 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - The Tribunal examines various legal precedents and observes that printing, without changing the fundamental character of the material, does not constitute manufacture. - The Tribunal concludes that the process of printing undertaken by the appellant does not meet the criteria for manufacture, as established by legal precedents and Chapter notes. Therefore, the demand for excise duty, interest, and penalties is set aside.
Activity amounting to manufacture or not - work of printed labels and printed cartons for corrugated boxes falling under Tariff Heading 48211020 and 48191010 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - The Tribunal examines various legal precedents and observes that printing, without changing the fundamental character of the material, does not constitute manufacture. - The Tribunal concludes that the process of printing undertaken by the appellant does not meet the criteria for manufacture, as established by legal precedents and Chapter notes. Therefore, the demand for excise duty, interest, and penalties is set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
