Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Validity of provisional attachment order - benefit of Input Tax Credit availed from invoices issued from non-existing firms - It observes that the impugned order lacks proper grounds and reasons for the provisional attachment, violating the principles outlined in Section 83 and Rule 159(5) of the CGST Rules. - Citing precedents from the Gujarat High Court and the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the court emphasizes the necessity for the attachment order to disclose reasons and grounds. - Consequently, the court sets aside the impugned order of provisional attachment, affirming the petitioner's contention regarding the lack of proper reasoning.
Validity of provisional attachment order - benefit of Input Tax Credit availed from invoices issued from non-existing firms - It observes that the impugned order lacks proper grounds and reasons for the provisional attachment, violating the principles outlined in Section 83 and Rule 159(5) of the CGST Rules. - Citing precedents from the Gujarat High Court and the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the court emphasizes the necessity for the attachment order to disclose reasons and grounds. - Consequently, the court sets aside the impugned order of provisional attachment, affirming the petitioner's contention regarding the lack of proper reasoning.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.