Transfer-pricing aggregation of distinct support-service and subcontract transactions was rejected, while debt-free receivables attracted no notional ...
Customs exemptions cover photovoltaic assembly machinery and PVF backsheets, while fully declared cleared imports may avoid confiscation and penalties...
Specific tariff classification for LCD devices overrides treatment as electricity-meter parts, defeating differential duty, extended limitation, and p...
Stayed disciplinary punishment does not establish unfitness for insolvency professional registration; reconsideration must disregard mere pendency of ...
Indirect corporate control can create related-party status, excluding financial creditors from Committee of Creditors representation, participation an...
Scientific research association approval requires continuing SIRO status, annual donation reporting, and donor certificates for the approved foundatio...
Scientific research institution approval is conditional on SIRO recognition, annual donation reporting, donor certification, and prescribed compliance...
Page of 4878
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 97553 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Unexplained expenditure - certain entries were found unmatched / not accounted for in the books of accounts in the expense ledger of the assessee - The assessee contended that the expenses were accounted for but not individually, and were incurred by employees at respective sites, later reimbursed by the assessee. However, the Tribunal (ITAT) found the explanation insufficient, emphasizing the need for proper documentation and evidence. While partially allowing the appeal, the tribunal imposed a restricted disallowance of 25% of the amount determined by the AO.
Unexplained expenditure - certain entries were found unmatched / not accounted for in the books of accounts in the expense ledger of the assessee - The assessee contended that the expenses were accounted for but not individually, and were incurred by employees at respective sites, later reimbursed by the assessee. However, the Tribunal (ITAT) found the explanation insufficient, emphasizing the need for proper documentation and evidence. While partially allowing the appeal, the tribunal imposed a restricted disallowance of 25% of the amount determined by the AO.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.