Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search ✕
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
❮ Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Filters / Advanced Search ❯
TEXT

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In
Main Text + AI Text ❯
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws---- ❯
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ---- ❯
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ---- ❯
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
☰   Show Results ❯
    Assessment jurisdiction transfers require proven searched-group nexus; isolated transactions alone cannot justify inter-State coordinated investigatio...
    Service of GST seizure orders is established by signed physical delivery, defeating a non-service challenge to seizure proceedings.
    Input tax credit survives supplier deregistration when bona fide purchase evidence is unrebutted and recipient collusion remains unproven.
    E-way bill obligations cover internal stock transfers, but penalties fail where bona fide error negates tax-evasion intent.
    Specific tariff classification places Ghamella/Tasla under taxable goods provisions rather than the agricultural hand-tool exemption.
    Proof of actual diversion is required before GST penalty can override a valid invoice and e-way bill.
    Compensation Cess ITC refunds require meeting the inverted-duty statutory test; eligible credit alone does not create cash-refund entitlement.
    Customs sampling powers over imported food coexist with food-safety controls, while testing disputes belong in statutory adjudication.
    Delayed transport documents failed to validate intercepted goods, sustaining transit-state penalties where the claimed interstate destination remained...
    Inverted tax refunds require independent statutory entitlement; eligible Compensation Cess credit alone does not justify cash refunds for domestic sup...
    Compensation Cess refund for domestic supplies requires statutory refund eligibility; credit availment alone does not create entitlement.
    E-way bill expiry triggers GST civil penalty without proof of tax-evasion intent where vehicle breakdown lacks credible evidence.
    Road-restoration charges form taxable consideration when restoration is requested for a business pipeline project under reverse charge.
    Refund adjustment against disputed penalty demands remains limited during first appeal, requiring reversal of excess recovery.
    Revisional limitation: an unrelated reassessment cannot extend time to revise an unexamined book-profit adjustment thereafter.
    Functional comparability under TNMM excludes software product and intangible-owning companies from software development service provider benchmarking.
    Recovery pending first appeal is capped at the CBDT stay threshold; excess refund adjustment requires repayment.
    Year-specific reassessment information cannot justify reopening when the underlying land-sale transaction belongs to the succeeding assessment year.
    Income Declaration Scheme eligibility may depend on verifying timely cheque tender and subsequent departmental credit under the applicable circular.
    Sufficient Cause for Delay Requires a Pleaded Explanation; Unexplained Inaction Leaves Revenue Appeal Time-Barred Under Limitation Law
❮
❯
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Disciplinary proceedings - allegation of misconduct -...

Ex-Superintendent's Misconduct Charges Quashed Due to Lack of Evidence and Improper Reliance on Confessional Statements.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Indian Laws March 7, 2024 Case Laws HC
Disciplinary proceedings - allegation of misconduct - Proceedings against ex-Superintendent of Central Excise - Reliance on confessional statements made by accused persons during the investigation - The High court underscored that disciplinary proceedings require evidence that meets legal principles, and reliance on confessional statements from a separate criminal investigation fails to satisfy this criterion. - It was concluded that the punishment orders were based on improper grounds, as the disciplinary actions were not supported by evidence that could logically prove the charges against the employees according to principles applicable to departmental inquiries. Thus, the punishment orders and the appellate decisions affirming them were quashed, and the employees were entitled to consequential benefits.

Topics

Acts Income Tax