Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 95872 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Allowable deduction of interest paid on the borrowings - Section 14A and Section 36(1)(iii) - Exempted dividend income - Based on the discussions and findings, the court dismissed the appeal, affirming the decision of the ITAT. It upheld the disallowance of the interest expense, considering the provisions of Section 14A and the principles established in the Maxopp Investment Ltd. case. The expenditure incurred on interest paid on borrowed funds for investment in shares of the two companies, from which dividend income does not form part of the total income, was held to be hit by Section 14A of the Act and not allowable as deduction.
Allowable deduction of interest paid on the borrowings - Section 14A and Section 36(1)(iii) - Exempted dividend income - Based on the discussions and findings, the court dismissed the appeal, affirming the decision of the ITAT. It upheld the disallowance of the interest expense, considering the provisions of Section 14A and the principles established in the Maxopp Investment Ltd. case. The expenditure incurred on interest paid on borrowed funds for investment in shares of the two companies, from which dividend income does not form part of the total income, was held to be hit by Section 14A of the Act and not allowable as deduction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.