Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Allowable deduction of interest paid on the borrowings - Section 14A and Section 36(1)(iii) - Exempted dividend income - Based on the discussions and findings, the court dismissed the appeal, affirming the decision of the ITAT. It upheld the disallowance of the interest expense, considering the provisions of Section 14A and the principles established in the Maxopp Investment Ltd. case. The expenditure incurred on interest paid on borrowed funds for investment in shares of the two companies, from which dividend income does not form part of the total income, was held to be hit by Section 14A of the Act and not allowable as deduction.
Allowable deduction of interest paid on the borrowings - Section 14A and Section 36(1)(iii) - Exempted dividend income - Based on the discussions and findings, the court dismissed the appeal, affirming the decision of the ITAT. It upheld the disallowance of the interest expense, considering the provisions of Section 14A and the principles established in the Maxopp Investment Ltd. case. The expenditure incurred on interest paid on borrowed funds for investment in shares of the two companies, from which dividend income does not form part of the total income, was held to be hit by Section 14A of the Act and not allowable as deduction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.