Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 95872 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Allowable deduction of interest paid on the borrowings - Section 14A and Section 36(1)(iii) - Exempted dividend income - Based on the discussions and findings, the court dismissed the appeal, affirming the decision of the ITAT. It upheld the disallowance of the interest expense, considering the provisions of Section 14A and the principles established in the Maxopp Investment Ltd. case. The expenditure incurred on interest paid on borrowed funds for investment in shares of the two companies, from which dividend income does not form part of the total income, was held to be hit by Section 14A of the Act and not allowable as deduction.
Allowable deduction of interest paid on the borrowings - Section 14A and Section 36(1)(iii) - Exempted dividend income - Based on the discussions and findings, the court dismissed the appeal, affirming the decision of the ITAT. It upheld the disallowance of the interest expense, considering the provisions of Section 14A and the principles established in the Maxopp Investment Ltd. case. The expenditure incurred on interest paid on borrowed funds for investment in shares of the two companies, from which dividend income does not form part of the total income, was held to be hit by Section 14A of the Act and not allowable as deduction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.