Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Dishonour of Cheque - security cheque or not - lease deed has been obtained by misrepresentation or not - rebuttal of presumption u/s 139 of the NI Act - The High Court concluded that the liability for cheque encashment arose only if the petitioners failed to pay dues to specified parties as agreed, and the respondent had to make those payments. - As the complaint did not demonstrate that such payments were made by the respondent due to the petitioners' default, the court found the complaint unsustainable.
Dishonour of Cheque - security cheque or not - lease deed has been obtained by misrepresentation or not - rebuttal of presumption u/s 139 of the NI Act - The High Court concluded that the liability for cheque encashment arose only if the petitioners failed to pay dues to specified parties as agreed, and the respondent had to make those payments. - As the complaint did not demonstrate that such payments were made by the respondent due to the petitioners' default, the court found the complaint unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
