Infrastructure-development deduction remains available to EPC contractors when substantive statutory conditions outweigh contractor labels in agreemen...
Explained Investment Sources: documented gifts and traceable salary savings supported deletion of additions for property and mutual-fund SIP investmen...
Internal comparable pricing supports arm's-length interest on compulsorily convertible debentures, preventing their recharacterisation as equity for t...
Nominee director protection shields independent financial-institution appointees from criminal liability where they lack involvement in deposit defaul...
Dishonour of Cheque - security cheque or not - lease deed has been obtained by misrepresentation or not - rebuttal of presumption u/s 139 of the NI Act - The High Court concluded that the liability for cheque encashment arose only if the petitioners failed to pay dues to specified parties as agreed, and the respondent had to make those payments. - As the complaint did not demonstrate that such payments were made by the respondent due to the petitioners' default, the court found the complaint unsustainable.
Dishonour of Cheque - security cheque or not - lease deed has been obtained by misrepresentation or not - rebuttal of presumption u/s 139 of the NI Act - The High Court concluded that the liability for cheque encashment arose only if the petitioners failed to pay dues to specified parties as agreed, and the respondent had to make those payments. - As the complaint did not demonstrate that such payments were made by the respondent due to the petitioners' default, the court found the complaint unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
