Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Eligibility of ex-promoter/Corporate Debtor u/s 29A read with Section 240A of the IBC to submit a resolution plan claiming the benefits of MSME - rejection of Resolution Plan. - The NCLAT held that obtaining MSME status post-CIRP commencement does not disqualify a corporate debtor from submitting a resolution plan under Section 29A of the IBC. - The NCLAT found that the Adjudicating Authority overstepped its jurisdiction by questioning the MSME status of the corporate debtor, as the authority to grant or revoke MSME registration lies solely with the competent authority under the MSME Act.
Eligibility of ex-promoter/Corporate Debtor u/s 29A read with Section 240A of the IBC to submit a resolution plan claiming the benefits of MSME - rejection of Resolution Plan. - The NCLAT held that obtaining MSME status post-CIRP commencement does not disqualify a corporate debtor from submitting a resolution plan under Section 29A of the IBC. - The NCLAT found that the Adjudicating Authority overstepped its jurisdiction by questioning the MSME status of the corporate debtor, as the authority to grant or revoke MSME registration lies solely with the competent authority under the MSME Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.