Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Eligibility of ex-promoter/Corporate Debtor u/s 29A read with Section 240A of the IBC to submit a resolution plan claiming the benefits of MSME - rejection of Resolution Plan. - The NCLAT held that obtaining MSME status post-CIRP commencement does not disqualify a corporate debtor from submitting a resolution plan under Section 29A of the IBC. - The NCLAT found that the Adjudicating Authority overstepped its jurisdiction by questioning the MSME status of the corporate debtor, as the authority to grant or revoke MSME registration lies solely with the competent authority under the MSME Act.
Eligibility of ex-promoter/Corporate Debtor u/s 29A read with Section 240A of the IBC to submit a resolution plan claiming the benefits of MSME - rejection of Resolution Plan. - The NCLAT held that obtaining MSME status post-CIRP commencement does not disqualify a corporate debtor from submitting a resolution plan under Section 29A of the IBC. - The NCLAT found that the Adjudicating Authority overstepped its jurisdiction by questioning the MSME status of the corporate debtor, as the authority to grant or revoke MSME registration lies solely with the competent authority under the MSME Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.