Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Exclusion of appellant from the Committee of Creditors (CoC) - The Resolution Professional deemed Rare ARC (appellant) akin to a related party, thus ineligible for CoC participation - assignment of term loan in bad faith - The NCLAT found that the assignment from SEFL to Rare ARC was made under suspicious circumstances, with SEFL still holding a significant interest in the loan through security receipts. Moreover, allegations regarding the funding of the assignment transaction by SIFL and SEFL raised doubts about the bona fide nature of the assignment. Consequently, Rare ARC's appeal was dismissed, affirming its exclusion from the CoC.
Exclusion of appellant from the Committee of Creditors (CoC) - The Resolution Professional deemed Rare ARC (appellant) akin to a related party, thus ineligible for CoC participation - assignment of term loan in bad faith - The NCLAT found that the assignment from SEFL to Rare ARC was made under suspicious circumstances, with SEFL still holding a significant interest in the loan through security receipts. Moreover, allegations regarding the funding of the assignment transaction by SIFL and SEFL raised doubts about the bona fide nature of the assignment. Consequently, Rare ARC's appeal was dismissed, affirming its exclusion from the CoC.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.