Transfer-pricing aggregation of distinct support-service and subcontract transactions was rejected, while debt-free receivables attracted no notional ...
Customs exemptions cover photovoltaic assembly machinery and PVF backsheets, while fully declared cleared imports may avoid confiscation and penalties...
Specific tariff classification for LCD devices overrides treatment as electricity-meter parts, defeating differential duty, extended limitation, and p...
Stayed disciplinary punishment does not establish unfitness for insolvency professional registration; reconsideration must disregard mere pendency of ...
Indirect corporate control can create related-party status, excluding financial creditors from Committee of Creditors representation, participation an...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Violation of principles of natural justice - Opportunity of personal haring not provided - discretion to grant an adjournment - The petitioner sought an extension to respond to a show-cause notice under Section 73(1) of the GST Act. Despite the petitioner's request, the respondent passed the final order without considering the extension application. The court found the respondent's actions to be a colorable exercise of power, violating principles of natural justice. - Consequently, the court set aside the impugned order and directed the petitioner to file its response by 15th March, 2024.
Violation of principles of natural justice - Opportunity of personal haring not provided - discretion to grant an adjournment - The petitioner sought an extension to respond to a show-cause notice under Section 73(1) of the GST Act. Despite the petitioner's request, the respondent passed the final order without considering the extension application. The court found the respondent's actions to be a colorable exercise of power, violating principles of natural justice. - Consequently, the court set aside the impugned order and directed the petitioner to file its response by 15th March, 2024.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.