Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Violation of principles of natural justice - Opportunity of personal haring not provided - discretion to grant an adjournment - The petitioner sought an extension to respond to a show-cause notice under Section 73(1) of the GST Act. Despite the petitioner's request, the respondent passed the final order without considering the extension application. The court found the respondent's actions to be a colorable exercise of power, violating principles of natural justice. - Consequently, the court set aside the impugned order and directed the petitioner to file its response by 15th March, 2024.
Violation of principles of natural justice - Opportunity of personal haring not provided - discretion to grant an adjournment - The petitioner sought an extension to respond to a show-cause notice under Section 73(1) of the GST Act. Despite the petitioner's request, the respondent passed the final order without considering the extension application. The court found the respondent's actions to be a colorable exercise of power, violating principles of natural justice. - Consequently, the court set aside the impugned order and directed the petitioner to file its response by 15th March, 2024.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
