Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Violation of principles of natural justice - impugned order does not take into consideration the reply submitted by the petitioner and is a cryptic order - The High court held that the proper officer failed to adequately consider the petitioner's reply on its merits and did not afford the petitioner an opportunity to clarify or provide further details. Consequently, the court set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter to the Proper Officer for re-adjudication, directing the officer to specify the required details/documents within one week.
Violation of principles of natural justice - impugned order does not take into consideration the reply submitted by the petitioner and is a cryptic order - The High court held that the proper officer failed to adequately consider the petitioner's reply on its merits and did not afford the petitioner an opportunity to clarify or provide further details. Consequently, the court set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter to the Proper Officer for re-adjudication, directing the officer to specify the required details/documents within one week.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
