Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 95633 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Scope of Advance Ruling application - classification of product Keer Kokil - The AAR had classified "Keer Kokil" as 'unmanufactured tobacco' under CTH 24012090, attracting GST @ 28% and Compensation Cess @71%. - The AAAR found that the appeal filed by CGST, Udaipur against the letter dated 11.07.2023 issued by AAR, Rajasthan was not maintainable as it was filed against a decision under Section 104 of the CGST Act, 2017, which is outside the purview of AAAR's domain.
Scope of Advance Ruling application - classification of product Keer Kokil - The AAR had classified "Keer Kokil" as 'unmanufactured tobacco' under CTH 24012090, attracting GST @ 28% and Compensation Cess @71%. - The AAAR found that the appeal filed by CGST, Udaipur against the letter dated 11.07.2023 issued by AAR, Rajasthan was not maintainable as it was filed against a decision under Section 104 of the CGST Act, 2017, which is outside the purview of AAAR's domain.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.