Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Scope of Advance Ruling application - classification of product Keer Kokil - The AAR had classified "Keer Kokil" as 'unmanufactured tobacco' under CTH 24012090, attracting GST @ 28% and Compensation Cess @71%. - The AAAR found that the appeal filed by CGST, Udaipur against the letter dated 11.07.2023 issued by AAR, Rajasthan was not maintainable as it was filed against a decision under Section 104 of the CGST Act, 2017, which is outside the purview of AAAR's domain.
Scope of Advance Ruling application - classification of product Keer Kokil - The AAR had classified "Keer Kokil" as 'unmanufactured tobacco' under CTH 24012090, attracting GST @ 28% and Compensation Cess @71%. - The AAAR found that the appeal filed by CGST, Udaipur against the letter dated 11.07.2023 issued by AAR, Rajasthan was not maintainable as it was filed against a decision under Section 104 of the CGST Act, 2017, which is outside the purview of AAAR's domain.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.