Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Customs officials claim to have received illicit gratification - Clearance of restricted goods without following proper procedures - improper finalization of provisional assessment - The review authority argued that the officials should be penalized for abetting the clearance of restricted goods, but the adjudicating authority disagreed, stating that the evidence did not support such claims. - The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the adjudicating authority's decision. It emphasized the importance of adhering to the charges outlined in the show cause notice and criticized attempts to introduce new allegations during the appeal process.
Customs officials claim to have received illicit gratification - Clearance of restricted goods without following proper procedures - improper finalization of provisional assessment - The review authority argued that the officials should be penalized for abetting the clearance of restricted goods, but the adjudicating authority disagreed, stating that the evidence did not support such claims. - The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the adjudicating authority's decision. It emphasized the importance of adhering to the charges outlined in the show cause notice and criticized attempts to introduce new allegations during the appeal process.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.