Judicial discipline requires consistent reassessment treatment where identical facts were decided for the same taxpayer in the preceding assessment ye...
Agreement-date stamp valuation requires the same registered property, fixed consideration, and qualifying payment; an unrelated prior booking cannot a...
Page of 4894
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 97867 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Effect of resignation from Directorship - ROC refused to remove the name of the Petitioner as a Director of Respondent No. 4-company - The High court acknowledged the peculiar circumstances of the case, particularly the non-commencement of business by the company and the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic. - The court interpreted Section 168(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, to determine the effective date of the petitioner's resignation as director. - Despite the company's failure to fulfill certain compliances, the court found no justifiable reason to prevent the Registrar of Companies from updating its records to reflect the petitioner's resignation.
Effect of resignation from Directorship - ROC refused to remove the name of the Petitioner as a Director of Respondent No. 4-company - The High court acknowledged the peculiar circumstances of the case, particularly the non-commencement of business by the company and the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic. - The court interpreted Section 168(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, to determine the effective date of the petitioner's resignation as director. - Despite the company's failure to fulfill certain compliances, the court found no justifiable reason to prevent the Registrar of Companies from updating its records to reflect the petitioner's resignation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4894 
