Reasoned rectification orders require consideration of expenditure disclosed in income-tax returns, preventing revision based on incomplete income com...
Modified returns after business reorganisations cannot trigger fresh scrutiny once the original assessment was complete, invalidating related transfer...
Third-party loose sheets require reliable nexus before supporting unexplained expenditure additions; presumptions do not establish payer identity or o...
TNMM comparability using audited accounts and working-capital adjustments can eliminate unwarranted transfer-pricing additions where verified margins ...
Gross-profit additions on disputed purchases require reasoned appellate determination; disclosed claims alone do not support inaccurate-particulars pe...
Limitation after transfer-pricing remand: fresh TPO reference did not extend the assessment deadline, rendering the consequential assessment time-barr...
Interim judicial restraint on tax deduction prevents default, while supporting reasonable cause and penalty deletion for foreign-leg LFC reimbursement...
Palmolein classification defeated the crude-oil concession; material misdeclaration sustained recovery and confiscation, while separate false-document...
Settlement application u/s 245C - Apportioning the undisclosed income in the hands of the petitioner and the Company - The High court examines the petitioner's disclosure and the basis for apportionment of income. It notes discrepancies and lack of clarity in the petitioner's submissions regarding the apportionment of unaccounted sales, expenditures, and income between the petitioner and the company. - The High court concurs with the Commission's finding that the petitioner did not disclose true and correct facts, violating the requirements of Section 245C(1).
Settlement application u/s 245C - Apportioning the undisclosed income in the hands of the petitioner and the Company - The High court examines the petitioner's disclosure and the basis for apportionment of income. It notes discrepancies and lack of clarity in the petitioner's submissions regarding the apportionment of unaccounted sales, expenditures, and income between the petitioner and the company. - The High court concurs with the Commission's finding that the petitioner did not disclose true and correct facts, violating the requirements of Section 245C(1).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4897 
