Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D - Addition of interest expenditure - The ITAT found substantial merit in the alternative contention of learned counsel for the assessee that the disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) should be computed with reference to investments giving rise to exempt income during the year and not the entire investment, which might give rise to exempt income in further. Accordingly, AO directed to recompute the disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(ii).
Disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D - Addition of interest expenditure - The ITAT found substantial merit in the alternative contention of learned counsel for the assessee that the disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) should be computed with reference to investments giving rise to exempt income during the year and not the entire investment, which might give rise to exempt income in further. Accordingly, AO directed to recompute the disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(ii).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.