Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
Adjustment of "seized asset" against "existing liability" and levy of "interest u/s 234B" - outer time period of 120 days - The ITAT held that Ld AO miserably failed to adhere to the provisions of section 132B[1] and the CIT [A] is not justified in confirming the interest charged u/s. 234B of the Act for the period up to 15-09-2010. Therefore AO directed to rework the computation in accordance with the provisions of law after providing proper opportunity of hearing to the assessees. - However, ITAT the claim concerning the grant of interest on seized assets u/s 132B(4), agreeing with the lower authorities that FDRs do not qualify as "money" for the purpose of interest entitlement.
Adjustment of "seized asset" against "existing liability" and levy of "interest u/s 234B" - outer time period of 120 days - The ITAT held that Ld AO miserably failed to adhere to the provisions of section 132B[1] and the CIT [A] is not justified in confirming the interest charged u/s. 234B of the Act for the period up to 15-09-2010. Therefore AO directed to rework the computation in accordance with the provisions of law after providing proper opportunity of hearing to the assessees. - However, ITAT the claim concerning the grant of interest on seized assets u/s 132B(4), agreeing with the lower authorities that FDRs do not qualify as "money" for the purpose of interest entitlement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
