Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Prayer for a direction extending the validity period of Duty Credit Certificate by a period of 15 years - permit use of the Duty Credit Certificate to defray I.G.S.T and G.S.T Compensation Cess - The High Court held that, the notifications and handbook provisions were within the legal authority and did not violate the petitioner's constitutional rights. - The court acknowledged the petitioner's entitlement under the TPS but noted the procedural and legal complexities that affected the utilization of duty credits. It highlighted that the entitlements were subject to the conditions and limitations set forth in the relevant notifications and handbook provisions. - Thus, the Court cannot come to the aid of the petitioner by granting the relief of extending time by 15 years as the same is not based on any concomitant right.
Prayer for a direction extending the validity period of Duty Credit Certificate by a period of 15 years - permit use of the Duty Credit Certificate to defray I.G.S.T and G.S.T Compensation Cess - The High Court held that, the notifications and handbook provisions were within the legal authority and did not violate the petitioner's constitutional rights. - The court acknowledged the petitioner's entitlement under the TPS but noted the procedural and legal complexities that affected the utilization of duty credits. It highlighted that the entitlements were subject to the conditions and limitations set forth in the relevant notifications and handbook provisions. - Thus, the Court cannot come to the aid of the petitioner by granting the relief of extending time by 15 years as the same is not based on any concomitant right.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
