Alternative statutory remedy and delay bar GST writ challenges despite pending rectification, while distinct subject matter permits parallel proceedin...
Unverified Insight Portal Information Cannot Justify Reassessment Without a Verified Taxpayer-Specific Income-Escape Nexus or Demonstrated Application...
Assessing Officer jurisdiction after statutory transfer invalidates reassessment notices issued by transferor officers and nullifies resulting proceed...
Consequential appeal-effect orders must implement rectification deleting working-capital adjustments and reconsider the resulting arm's-length range c...
Discounted cash flow valuation protects share premium where projections are reasonable, while audited book expenses defeat unexplained-expenditure add...
Section 54 construction relief survives pre-transfer commencement when completion occurs within the statutory period, excluding ineligible spouse-owne...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
921 to 940 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Conversion of Shipping bill under Drawback scheme to Advance Authorisation scheme - Condition provided in Board's Circular No. 36/2010 - Payment of customs duties on goods exported - The CESTAT observed that, Adjudicating authority concluded that the Appellant was not diligent in maintaining the records and on that ground, the request for amendment is denied. However as per the finding in the order, when certain omissions were brought to the notice of the Appellant, they have verified the records and rectified the same and therefore it cannot be concluded as they are not diligent in maintaining the records. - Thus, the impugned order rejecting the request for conversion of the shipping bill based on the Circular No.36/2010 is set aside.
Conversion of Shipping bill under Drawback scheme to Advance Authorisation scheme - Condition provided in Board's Circular No. 36/2010 - Payment of customs duties on goods exported - The CESTAT observed that, Adjudicating authority concluded that the Appellant was not diligent in maintaining the records and on that ground, the request for amendment is denied. However as per the finding in the order, when certain omissions were brought to the notice of the Appellant, they have verified the records and rectified the same and therefore it cannot be concluded as they are not diligent in maintaining the records. - Thus, the impugned order rejecting the request for conversion of the shipping bill based on the Circular No.36/2010 is set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
