Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
Embezzlement losses in charitable institutions remain allowable when misappropriation is established, irrecoverable, and not a specified-person benefi...
National long-distance undertaking status supports deduction where separately licensed infrastructure, resources, revenue, and expenditure establish c...
Agency reimbursement income follows contractual deposit-liability computation, while pending deposit collections do not constitute deemed-dividend loa...
Validity of grant of permission to the petitioner’s assessing authority, to re-assess the petitioner - The HC observed that, since, the assessing officer failed to make any specific order of assessment in terms of Section 29(6) of the Act till 30.09.2016, his powers to make the regular assessment stood exhausted. - The High court quashed the reassessment order dated 17.03.2021 and the permission granted for reassessment, deeming them nullities due to lack of jurisdiction and absence of a valid reason to believe that any part of the petitioner's turnover had escaped assessment.
Validity of grant of permission to the petitioner’s assessing authority, to re-assess the petitioner - The HC observed that, since, the assessing officer failed to make any specific order of assessment in terms of Section 29(6) of the Act till 30.09.2016, his powers to make the regular assessment stood exhausted. - The High court quashed the reassessment order dated 17.03.2021 and the permission granted for reassessment, deeming them nullities due to lack of jurisdiction and absence of a valid reason to believe that any part of the petitioner's turnover had escaped assessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4894 
