Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Refund of excess TDS deducted u/s 195 - Unjust Enrichment of the Government - whether the respondents are authorised by law to withhold the excess TDS paid by the petitioner? - Latin maxim “jure naturae aequum est, neminem cum alterius detrimento, et injuria fieri locupletioremit” - The High Court, after considering constitutional provisions, legal principles, and precedents, held that the excess TDS deposited by the company should be refunded. It emphasized that tax collection should only be done in accordance with the law.
Refund of excess TDS deducted u/s 195 - Unjust Enrichment of the Government - whether the respondents are authorised by law to withhold the excess TDS paid by the petitioner? - Latin maxim “jure naturae aequum est, neminem cum alterius detrimento, et injuria fieri locupletioremit” - The High Court, after considering constitutional provisions, legal principles, and precedents, held that the excess TDS deposited by the company should be refunded. It emphasized that tax collection should only be done in accordance with the law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
