Valuation of imported goods - electronic goods including branded...

Valuation of imported goods - electronic goods including branded and non - The tribunal held that the adjudicating authority and the Commissioner (Appeals) failed to provide cogent reasons and evidence for rejecting the declared transaction value. - The tribunal enhancement of value based solely on NIDB data without additional evidence or proper analysis was erroneous. - The CESTAT further held that, there no evidence of misdeclaration or undervaluation by the appellant. - Rejection of value declared on a Bill of Entry is a serious action that should be supported by compelling provision, evidence and justifiable reasons.