Judicial discipline requires consistent reassessment treatment where identical facts were decided for the same taxpayer in the preceding assessment ye...
Agreement-date stamp valuation requires the same registered property, fixed consideration, and qualifying payment; an unrelated prior booking cannot a...
Page of 4894
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 97867 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Validity of Faceless assessment - procedure contemplated u/s 144B - The petitioner contended that their objections and replies were not considered before passing the assessment order, contrary to the procedures outlined in Section 144B(1)(vii), (xiv), and (xvi)(b) of the Act. The High Court found merit in this argument, noting that the failure to consider the petitioner's responses violated procedural requirements, thereby vitiating the assessment proceedings. - Matter restored back for fresh adjudication.
Validity of Faceless assessment - procedure contemplated u/s 144B - The petitioner contended that their objections and replies were not considered before passing the assessment order, contrary to the procedures outlined in Section 144B(1)(vii), (xiv), and (xvi)(b) of the Act. The High Court found merit in this argument, noting that the failure to consider the petitioner's responses violated procedural requirements, thereby vitiating the assessment proceedings. - Matter restored back for fresh adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4894 
