Appellate jurisdiction over baggage imports is excluded, requiring confiscation challenges involving passenger-carried gold to proceed by statutory re...
Article 227 review permits intervention in arbitration only for manifest, patent inherent jurisdictional defects, not representational authority dispu...
Disallowance of deduction u/s 80IA(4)(i) - The tribunal noted the distinction between a developer (who assumes significant risks and responsibilities for the project) and a contractor (who does not assume such risks and is only responsible for executing work as per the contract) - The tribunal directed that, based on the nature of contracts and risks assumed, the assessee's claim for deductions under Section 80IA(4) should be allowed, emphasizing the role of the assessee as a developer rather than a mere contractor.
Disallowance of deduction u/s 80IA(4)(i) - The tribunal noted the distinction between a developer (who assumes significant risks and responsibilities for the project) and a contractor (who does not assume such risks and is only responsible for executing work as per the contract) - The tribunal directed that, based on the nature of contracts and risks assumed, the assessee's claim for deductions under Section 80IA(4) should be allowed, emphasizing the role of the assessee as a developer rather than a mere contractor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
