Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Levy of penalty - appellant as the Customs Broker was vicariously responsible for the actions of his employees or not - export consignment was highly overvalued - The Tribunal noted that the appellant was not involved in filing the incorrect shipping bills and had no knowledge of them. Consequently, the penalties imposed under Sections 114 and 117 of the Customs Act were deemed unjustifiable.
Levy of penalty - appellant as the Customs Broker was vicariously responsible for the actions of his employees or not - export consignment was highly overvalued - The Tribunal noted that the appellant was not involved in filing the incorrect shipping bills and had no knowledge of them. Consequently, the penalties imposed under Sections 114 and 117 of the Customs Act were deemed unjustifiable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
